Responding to a Complaint
From Right 10 to the Tribunal: what happens after an HDC complaint or council notification, and how to write an honest, well-evidenced response.
Complaints, insight and remediation
Repairing relationships with patients, whānau, colleagues, employers, your responsible authority and yourself after a concern in Aotearoa New Zealand
Doctors, nurses, midwives, pharmacists, dental and oral health practitioners, paramedics and allied health practitioners registered under the HPCA Act 2003 who are dealing with, or have come through, a complaint or concern; also supervisors and clinical leaders who support them.
Structured learning and a written reflection to show insight after a complaint, an investigation or a responsible authority inquiry.
Focused learning on a core standard of practice, with a certificate and reflection for your portfolio.
This course is about what happens to relationships after a complaint or concern, and how a health practitioner can earn trust back. It treats trust as something with parts that can be damaged separately: confidence in your competence, belief in your honesty, a sense that you care, and the expectation that you will do what you say. It then works through each group whose trust is affected: the patient and whānau, colleagues and the wider team, your employer, your responsible authority and, where it applies, the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal, the community you serve, and your own confidence in your practice.
It is written for doctors, nurses, midwives, pharmacists, dental and oral health practitioners, paramedics, psychologists, physiotherapists and other practitioners registered under the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003, whether a complaint is still open, has recently closed or ended with conditions, a competence programme or a Tribunal penalty. It is also useful for clinical leaders and supervisors who support colleagues after a concern.
Responding to a complaint, remediating and showing insight are covered in separate courses. This one picks up the relational work that those processes do not finish for you: continuing care with a patient who complained, restorative conversations, returning to a team that knows what happened, keeping an employer's confidence, complying with conditions in a way that builds a track record, moving jobs honestly, living with published decisions in a small country, and repairing trust in a way that is culturally safe and consistent with Te Tiriti o Waitangi.
10 sections · 24 lessons · 3 hours (estimated) · 20-question final assessment
Final assessment
20scenario-based questions
Certificate of completion
A certificate of completion for your learning portfolio.
The course includes a structured reflective account template: guided prompts to record what you learned, how you will apply it and how the change will show in your practice. It gives you written evidence of insight after a concern, and a ready record for your CPD portfolio.
Write it in your own words and leave out anything that could identify a patient, a colleague or a case. If you have an open complaint or case, talk to your adviser before reflecting on it in writing.
The course treats trust as four linked elements: confidence in your competence, belief in your integrity, a sense that you care, and reliability. A competence lapse and an integrity lapse damage different elements and need different repair, so you first work out what was damaged, and for whom.
Acknowledging, accounting, amending, assuring and sustaining. The course shows what each stage looks like with patients, colleagues, employers and your responsible authority, and the behaviours that undo repair, such as defensiveness, minimising or contacting a complainant in the wrong way.
The course helps you decide, using the Code of Rights and your regulator's code, whether and how to continue care without retaliation or neglect, and how to plan a restorative conversation or hui with a patient and whānau that is safe, voluntary and culturally responsive.
Honestly. The course covers working with an employer on a return-to-full-duties plan, answering questions in job applications, references and APC declarations accurately, and responding proportionately to published decisions, media interest or online comment while protecting patient privacy. Concealment usually does more damage than the original complaint.
It shows how complying with conditions, programmes and supervision builds a documented track record an authority can rely on. It cannot promise any outcome, and ordered education must be confirmed with whoever set it. Three hours (estimated), NZ$139; no council has approved it.
Every legal and regulatory point comes from primary sources: the HPCA Act 2003, the responsible authorities' standards and the Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights. Anything we cannot confirm is left out.
Lessons, scenarios and assessment questions are written by us for each edition separately, then checked for accuracy, teaching quality and fair assessment before publication.
When a code, standard or law changes, the affected courses are reviewed and updated. Reported errors in legal or regulatory facts are corrected first.
From Right 10 to the Tribunal: what happens after an HDC complaint or council notification, and how to write an honest, well-evidenced response.
Turn a concern into a credible remediation plan: root-cause analysis, testable objectives, supervision and audit, and an organised evidence bundle.
Understand and show genuine insight: the four elements decision makers weigh, red flags of limited insight, and a seven-question reflection method.