Open Disclosure After Harm: Honest Communication When Care Goes Wrong
Honest communication when care goes wrong: HDC open disclosure guidance, the HQSC adverse events policy, ACC treatment injury and culturally safe apology.
NZComplaints, insight and remediation
Right 10, the Health and Disability Commissioner, responsible authorities, PCCs and the Tribunal: what happens and how to respond well
This course explains what happens when a complaint or concern is raised about a registered health practitioner in Aotearoa New Zealand, and how to respond at every stage. It covers provider-level complaints under Right 10 of the Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights, the Health and Disability Commissioner's assessment and investigation process, notifications to responsible authorities under the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003, competence reviews, Professional Conduct Committees and the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal.
It is written for doctors, nurses, midwives, dentists and oral health practitioners, pharmacists, and allied health practitioners registered with any of New Zealand's 18 responsible authorities. It suits practitioners who want to be prepared, those currently responding to a complaint, and those supporting colleagues or managing complaints in a team.
New Zealand's complaints system gives consumers a strong legal right to complain and gives practitioners clear opportunities to resolve concerns early, show insight and learn. The course is practical: you will learn the timeframes, the outcomes each body can reach, how to build a chronology, how to write a response that is honest, reflective and evidenced, how to use indemnity, union and legal advice, and how to look after your wellbeing while a matter is open.
10 sections, 3 CPD hours, 20-question final assessment
Registered health practitioners in New Zealand: doctors, nurses, midwives, dentists and oral health practitioners, pharmacists, and allied health practitioners under the HPCA Act 2003.
Continuing professional development record for your portfolio.
Right 10 of the Code of Rights requires providers to have a complaints process. A complaint should be acknowledged in writing within 5 working days, and within 10 working days of acknowledging it you should decide whether it is justified or that more time is needed. The course works through these timeframes and how to keep the consumer updated.
After assessment, HDC can close the file, pass it back for you and the consumer to settle with Advocacy Service support, refer it elsewhere (often to your responsible authority), make recommendations, or investigate formally. Under investigation you normally get 15 days for your reply, and a provisional opinion is shared with you before anything is finalised.
Yes. You learn to lay out a timeline that keeps three things apart (what the notes say, what you remember, what you normally do), then write a structured response with a sincere apology where appropriate, credible reflection and evidence of change. HDC points out that handing over information it requests is not a privacy or confidentiality breach. The course is education, not legal advice.
PCC decisions are not appealable, although judicial review in the High Court is possible. A PCC can make recommendations to your responsible authority, send the matter to conciliation, take no further steps, or bring a charge before the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal. The course explains each outcome and the Tribunal's two-stage misconduct test.
Many practitioners complete it early so their response reflects genuine learning. For NZ$139 you get 3 CPD hours, a 20-item test passed at 80%, and both a certificate and a reflective account to keep. No course can alter or promise the result of an HDC, council, PCC or Tribunal process, so take advice too, from your indemnity insurer, NZNO or another union, or a lawyer.
Honest communication when care goes wrong: HDC open disclosure guidance, the HQSC adverse events policy, ACC treatment injury and culturally safe apology.
Turn a concern into a credible remediation plan: root-cause analysis, testable objectives, supervision and audit, and an organised evidence bundle.
Understand and show genuine insight: the four elements decision makers weigh, red flags of limited insight, and a seven-question reflection method.