Ethics for New Zealand Health Practitioners
Ethical reasoning for Aotearoa: a seven-step decision framework, the Code of Rights, Te Tiriti and cultural safety, conscientious objection and end-of-life law.
Profession-specific standards
Applying Good medical practice and the Medical Council's statements to prescribing, certification, money, technology and colleagues
Doctors registered with the Medical Council of New Zealand in general, vocational and provisional scopes, including GPs, specialists, registrars, house officers, rural and urgent care doctors, international medical graduates and doctors in leadership roles.
Structured learning and a written reflection to show insight after a complaint, an investigation or a responsible authority inquiry.
Focused learning on a core standard of practice, with a certificate and reflection for your portfolio.
This course is about the ethical decisions that are specific to being a doctor in Aotearoa New Zealand. It works through the Medical Council's Good medical practice (2021) and the Council statements that govern a doctor's gatekeeping roles: treating yourself and those close to you (October 2024), prescribing (2024), medical certification (2023), commercial organisations (2023), telehealth and complementary medicine, ending a doctor-patient relationship, resource constraints, the Council's March 2026 guidance on artificial intelligence, unprofessional behaviour, cultural safety and concerns about another doctor.
It is written for doctors in every scope of practice: general practitioners, hospital specialists and registrars, house officers, urgent care and rural doctors, international medical graduates new to New Zealand, and doctors in leadership roles who supervise physician associates, nurses and other colleagues. Each section uses New Zealand case examples, including a published decision of the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal, and ends with a knowledge check.
Council statements are the yardstick used by the Medical Council, Professional Conduct Committees, the Tribunal and the Health and Disability Commissioner when a doctor's conduct is questioned. Most cases that reach them are not dramatic dilemmas but a drift away from these standards in everyday tasks. Knowing exactly what the statements require, and how to apply them under pressure, protects patients, colleagues and your own practice.
10 sections · 22 lessons · 3 hours (estimated) · 20-question final assessment
Final assessment
20scenario-based questions
Certificate of completion
A certificate of completion for your learning portfolio.
The course includes a structured reflective account template: guided prompts to record what you learned, how you will apply it and how the change will show in your practice. It gives you written evidence of insight after a concern, and a ready record for your CPD portfolio.
Write it in your own words and leave out anything that could identify a patient, a colleague or a case. If you have an open complaint or case, talk to your adviser before reflecting on it in writing.
The general course teaches a decision framework for all practitioners. This one is built only around the Medical Council's Good medical practice (2021) and its statements, so it focuses on doctors' gatekeeping roles: prescribing, certificates and reports, treating yourself and those close to you, commercial interests, ending care, resource limits and AI.
Yes, the October 2024 version, including its exceptions and its limits on prescribing and certification for yourself, family, friends and colleagues. A published Tribunal decision is analysed to show how Council statements are used to decide professional misconduct and penalty.
It works through assisted dying under the 2019 Act, with the Council's mapping of its statements to that legislation, whether you object or act as attending medical practitioner, and uses Good medical practice paragraphs 19 to 21 and section 174 of the HPCA Act for personal beliefs and conscientious objection.
Yes. The March 2026 guidance on using artificial intelligence in patient care is covered together with delegation and accountability: you may use AI tools and scribes, but you remain responsible for the clinical decision, the record, and the patient's consent and privacy.
Credit is set by Inpractice for general scope and by your college or accredited provider for vocational scope, so we never claim a fixed value or Council approval. Many doctors record it as an educational activity with a reflection. It is 3 hours (estimated), NZ$139, online and self-paced.
Every legal and regulatory point comes from primary sources: the HPCA Act 2003, the responsible authorities' standards and the Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights. Anything we cannot confirm is left out.
Lessons, scenarios and assessment questions are written by us for each edition separately, then checked for accuracy, teaching quality and fair assessment before publication.
When a code, standard or law changes, the affected courses are reviewed and updated. Reported errors in legal or regulatory facts are corrected first.
Ethical reasoning for Aotearoa: a seven-step decision framework, the Code of Rights, Te Tiriti and cultural safety, conscientious objection and end-of-life law.
Medical Council standards in practice: scopes and titles, clinical care, prescribing, cosmetic procedures, supervision of learners and PAs, and telehealth.
Honesty in records, certificates, ACC invoicing, APC declarations and conflicts of interest, mapped to the HPCA Act and your responsible authority's code.