How the Canadian system fits together
Health professions in Canada are regulated by the provinces and territories, not by Ottawa. In most cases a self-regulating college, or in Quebec an ordre, licenses you, sets your standards and deals with complaints, under a provincial statute. Your college's job is to protect the public, not to resolve a patient's grievance or award compensation; claims for compensation go through the civil courts or your protective association or insurer.
| Province | Main statute | Who screens complaints | Who decides discipline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ontario | Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991 and Health Professions Procedural Code | Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee (ICRC) | The college's Discipline Committee or tribunal |
| British Columbia | Health Professions and Occupations Act (from 1 April 2026) | The college's investigation committee | Independent discipline tribunal panels under a director of discipline |
| Alberta | Health Professions Act | The college's complaints director | A hearing tribunal, with appeal to the college council |
| Quebec | Professional Code | The ordre's syndic | The ordre's disciplinary council |
The other provinces and territories have their own statutes, in some cases one Act per profession, with the same broad stages: a complaint or report, an investigation, a screening decision, a possible hearing and an appeal. Check the process of the college that holds your licence; if you are licensed in more than one province, each college can act.
From complaint to outcome: the usual path in 8 steps
Many matters are resolved at the screening stage, and only the most serious go to a hearing.
- A concern reaches the college. A patient, family member, colleague or employer complains, a mandatory report is made, or the college learns of something itself, such as a charge or a media report.
- You are notified. The college sends you the complaint or a summary of the concern and invites a written response, usually by a stated date. Contact your adviser before you reply.
- The college investigates. It may request your records, interview people, obtain an expert opinion or arrange a practice assessment. You must cooperate, and you will usually see the key material before a decision.
- Interim action, rarely. If the college believes patients are at serious risk, it can seek interim terms, conditions or a suspension while the matter continues, with a chance for you to respond.
- A screening decision. Outcomes range from no action, through advice or recommendations, a caution, a remediation requirement or an agreed undertaking, to referral to a hearing. Health concerns may go to a separate incapacity or fitness process.
- Remediation, if required. You complete the education, mentoring, supervision or assessment set out, and report back to the college.
- A hearing, for serious matters. A panel with professional and public members hears evidence and decides whether misconduct or incompetence is proven, then decides the penalty.
- Review or appeal. Depending on the province and the decision, a complainant or registrant may ask a review board to look again at a screening decision, and either party may appeal a hearing decision to a court or tribunal.
Ontario: the ICRC, SCERPs, undertakings and HPARB
Ontario's Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991 covers most regulated health professions, from physicians and nurses to dietitians and respiratory therapists, and their colleges all use the same Health Professions Procedural Code. Complaints and registrar's reports go to the college's Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee (ICRC), which works in panels with professional and public members.
After an investigation, and once you have had a chance to make written submissions, the ICRC can:
- take no action;
- give advice or recommendations;
- issue a caution, in writing or in person;
- require a specified continuing education or remediation program (SCERP), such as courses on documentation or ethics, mentoring or a reassessment;
- accept an undertaking from you, for example to complete education, practise under supervision or restrict your practice;
- refer allegations of professional misconduct or incompetence to the Discipline Committee (at CPSO, the Ontario Physicians and Surgeons Discipline Tribunal);
- refer a possible health concern for an incapacity inquiry, which can lead to the Fitness to Practise Committee.
Cautions, SCERPs and many undertakings are noted on the college's public register. For complaint decisions (not referrals to discipline or incapacity), either you or the complainant can ask the Health Professions Appeal and Review Board (HPARB) to review whether the investigation was adequate and the decision reasonable. Discipline decisions can be appealed to the Divisional Court. Ontario also has strict sexual-abuse provisions, including mandatory revocation for certain acts.
Responding to a College Complaint or Investigation
Remediation After a College Concern
Insight: Showing a College You Understand
Reflective Practice and Reflective Statements
British Columbia: the Health Professions and Occupations Act
On 1 April 2026 the Health Professions and Occupations Act (HPOA) replaced BC's Health Professions Act. Regulated professionals are now called licensees, and a new provincial oversight office supervises the colleges.
- Colleges still take complaints and investigate. The former inquiry committee is now an investigation committee, which can resolve matters, sometimes by consent, once you have seen the investigation report.
- Summary protection orders can impose limits, conditions or a suspension where there are reasonable grounds to believe there is a significant risk of harm.
- Discipline is no longer decided by the college. A director of discipline, appointed by the Minister of Health, runs an independent discipline tribunal. Its panels include a licensee, a member of the public and a specialist in the relevant area, and colleges enforce their orders.
- Publication changes. CPSBC explains that disciplinary actions and summary protection orders appear on the public register, while complaints resolved without discipline, such as with advice, are not published.
Matters that started before 1 April 2026 may follow transition rules, so check with your college and adviser which process applies to yours.
Responding to a College Complaint or Investigation
Fitness to Practise: Health, Conduct and Competence
Preventing Recurrence After an Error or Misconduct
Alberta: the Health Professions Act
Under Alberta's Health Professions Act, each college has a complaints director who decides what to do with a complaint. The director can dismiss it with written reasons, encourage resolution, conduct or appoint an investigation, and recommend interim suspension or conditions where there is a risk to the public. The Act also provides for alternative complaint resolution, where both sides agree.
If a complaint is dismissed, the complainant can ask a complaint review committee to consider whether the dismissal was reasonable. Serious matters go to a hearing tribunal. You or the complaints director can appeal the tribunal's decision to the college's council (at CPSA, an appeal panel of council members), and from there to the Court of Appeal of Alberta.
Responding to a College Complaint or Investigation
Insight: Showing a College You Understand
Remediation After a College Concern
Quebec: the syndic and the disciplinary council
Quebec's Professional Code governs every professional ordre, including the Collège des médecins, the OIIQ, the Ordre des dentistes and the Ordre des pharmaciens. Anyone can ask an ordre's syndic to inquire into a professional's conduct. The syndic investigates and decides whether to file a complaint before the ordre's disciplinary council; a person who asked for the inquiry and disagrees with a decision not to file can ask the ordre's review committee for an opinion, and private complaints are also possible.
The disciplinary council is an independent, quasi-judicial body chaired by a lawyer appointed by the government, sitting with two members of the profession. Hearings are generally public. Sanctions include a reprimand, fines, limits on or suspension of the right to practise, and temporary or permanent striking off the roll. Decisions can be appealed to the Tribunal des professions.
Ordres also run professional inspection, which can lead to refresher training or a limit on practice outside the disciplinary route.
Responding to a College Complaint or Investigation
What happens after a college complaint, and how to respond with honesty, the right tone, intact records and remediation you can evidence.
Rebuilding Trust After a Complaint
How to rebuild trust with patients, the public and your college after a complaint or incident, through insight, honest disclosure and apology, cultural safety and sustained, evidenced change.
Saskatchewan, Manitoba, the Atlantic provinces and the territories
Outside the four largest provinces the stages are similar, a complaint or report, an investigation, a screening decision and a possible hearing, but each college works under its own legislation and uses its own committee names. Read your college's complaints page and the letter itself for the exact terms.
- Saskatchewan regulates each profession under its own statute, for example The Medical Profession Act, 1981 for the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan. Other colleges include the College of Registered Nurses of Saskatchewan, the College of Licensed Practical Nurses of Saskatchewan, the College of Dental Surgeons of Saskatchewan and the Saskatchewan College of Pharmacy Professionals.
- Manitoba has moved several professions, including physicians (2019) and registered nurses (2018), under The Regulated Health Professions Act; others remain under profession-specific Acts. Colleges include the College of Physicians & Surgeons of Manitoba, the College of Registered Nurses of Manitoba and the College of Pharmacists of Manitoba.
- Nova Scotia passed a Regulated Health Professions Act in November 2023 and is migrating professions to it in phases, with dentistry and pharmacy in the first group and physicians and nursing in the last. Regulators include the College of Physicians & Surgeons of Nova Scotia, the Nova Scotia Nursing and Midwifery Regulator and the Nova Scotia Pharmacy Regulator.
- New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland and Labrador each have a College of Physicians and Surgeons, along with bodies such as the Nurses Association of New Brunswick, the College of Registered Nurses and Midwives of Prince Edward Island and the College of Registered Nurses of Newfoundland and Labrador.
- Yukon, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut license many professions through territorial registrars or councils, such as the Yukon Medical Council, and nurses through the Yukon Registered Nurses Association or the Registered Nurses Association of the Northwest Territories and Nunavut.
Self-reporting and reporting others
Honesty with your college is itself a standard, and failing to report can become a separate concern. In Ontario, the Procedural Code requires registrants to report matters such as:
- being charged with or found guilty of an offence, including bail conditions or restrictions linked to a charge;
- findings of professional negligence or malpractice;
- membership of another regulatory body, and findings or proceedings against you by a regulator anywhere.
Ontario professionals must also report reasonable grounds to believe that another regulated health professional has sexually abused a patient, and employers and facility operators have their own reporting duties. Other provinces set comparable duties in statute, regulation or college standards, so check your own college's requirements and deadlines. The probity course covers mandatory declaration and self-reporting, including reporting criminal charges.
Probity and Honesty in Practice
Honesty and integrity across records, communication, billing to provincial plans and professional claims, including self-reporting duties and remediation after a probity concern.
Professional Boundaries with Patients and Colleagues
Boundaries with patients and colleagues: power, gifts, dual relationships, social media, workplace conduct and the zero-tolerance rules on sexual abuse.
Getting advice: the CMPA, the CNPS, unions and lawyers
Get advice before you respond. The right source depends on your profession:
- Physicians: the Canadian Medical Protective Association. Its guidance for college complaints asks members to contact it early, before replying to the college, to leave records unaltered and not to contact the complainant about the matter.
- Nurses: the Canadian Nurses Protective Society or your union. What CNPS covers for regulatory complaints depends on your province and the coverage you hold, so check your eligibility.
- Other professions: your professional liability insurer, professional association or union, or a lawyer who practises regulatory health law.
Whatever your profession: keep copies of everything, meet every deadline or ask for more time in writing, never alter a record, and do not discuss the complaint with the complainant or on social media.
What helps: insight, remediation and an honest response
Screening committees aim to protect the public, and some colleges describe remediation as their main focus at that stage, weighing how serious the concern is, whether it has happened before and what the evidence shows. Within that, your own response matters most in three ways:
- Insight. Show that you understand what went wrong, why it mattered to the patient and what your part was, without minimizing or blaming others.
- Remediation with evidence. Targeted learning, supervision or mentoring, an audit of your own practice and written reflection show change that someone else can check.
- Candour and cooperation. A factual, respectful response on time, complete records and honesty with the patient from the start.
Our complaint, insight, reflection and remediation courses work as a set, with the preventing recurrence and rebuilding trust courses for later stages. See the remediation courses page to pair them with the topic of your concern.
Our courses do not guarantee any outcome and are not legal advice. Colleges decide what learning they accept.
Remediation After a College Concern
Insight: Showing a College You Understand
Responding to a College Complaint or Investigation
Preventing Recurrence After an Error or Misconduct
Rebuilding Trust After a Complaint
Putting together your remediation evidence
Most professionals answering a complaint send one written response and, sometimes, later submissions. Evidence of remediation is usually most useful when it is organized, accurate and clearly linked to the concerns raised. A simple structure that works in any province:
| Part | What to include |
|---|---|
| Summary | One page, one line per allegation: the standard involved, what you have learned and what you have changed |
| Learning | Certificates of completion for targeted courses, dated after the events, and any supervision or mentoring you have arranged |
| Reflection | A reflective account for each course, linked to the specific concern and to your own practice |
| Practice change | Audits of your own records, revised procedures, checklists, competency sign-offs or feedback from a supervisor or colleague |
| Index | Numbered items so the reader can follow the file, with copies kept of everything sent |
Agree the content and timing with your adviser: the CMPA for physicians, the CNPS or your union for nurses, and your insurer or lawyer for other professions. If an undertaking, a SCERP or an order already sets out education, follow its terms first. Colleges decide what weight to give any learning, and no course, including ours, can promise a result.
Guidance for your profession
Each profession page names the right colleges, maps courses to their standards and suggests a set by concern:
- Remediation courses for doctors
- Remediation courses for nurses and midwives
- Remediation courses for dentists
- Remediation courses for pharmacists
- Remediation courses for optometrists and opticians
- Remediation courses for chiropractors
- Remediation courses for osteopathic practitioners, a profession with no statutory regulator for manual practitioners
Recommended courses
All coursesResponding to a College Complaint or Investigation
What happens after a college complaint, and how to respond with honesty, the right tone, intact records and remediation you can evidence.
Insight: Showing a College You Understand
What insight means to a Canadian college, the spectrum from denial to full accountability, and practical ways to evidence insight after a complaint or during a SCERP.
Remediation After a College Concern
How to build genuine, evidenced remediation after a college concern: choosing activities, setting SMART goals, gathering audit evidence and communicating a plan to your college.
Reflective Practice and Reflective Statements
How to reflect beyond description, apply Gibbs, Rolfe and Johns, and write an honest, evidenced reflective statement for a college, employer or SCERP.
Preventing Recurrence After an Error or Misconduct
For a second concern, or to prevent one: root causes, practical safeguards and a 'no repeat' file built on evidence, not assurances.
Probity and Honesty in Practice
Honesty and integrity across records, communication, billing to provincial plans and professional claims, including self-reporting duties and remediation after a probity concern.
Questions
Is a college complaint the same as a lawsuit?
No. A college complaint is about whether you met professional standards and whether the public needs protecting. It cannot award the patient compensation. A claim for damages is a separate civil matter, usually handled with your protective association or insurer.
Do I have to respond to my college?
You are expected to cooperate with your college, and failing to respond or cooperate can become a concern in itself. You choose what to say, ideally with advice. Ask for more time in writing if you need it.
What is an undertaking?
A written promise you give the college, for example to complete education, practise under supervision, or stop a particular kind of practice. It is usually agreed in place of a more formal step. Undertakings are binding, are often noted on the public register, and breaking one is treated seriously, so take advice before you sign.
What is the difference between a caution and a SCERP in Ontario?
A caution is the ICRC telling you, in writing or in person, that your conduct or practice fell short. A SCERP requires you to complete specified education or remediation. Neither is a finding of professional misconduct, but both are noted on the public register.
Can my college restrict my practice before anything is proven?
Yes, in limited cases. Where there is a serious risk to patients, colleges can seek interim terms, conditions or a suspension during an investigation; in BC these are called summary protection orders. You are normally entitled to respond. Get advice immediately if this happens.
Can I challenge a college decision?
It depends on the province and the decision. In Ontario, you or the complainant can ask HPARB to review a complaint decision, and discipline decisions go to the Divisional Court. In Alberta, hearing tribunal decisions can be appealed to council and then the Court of Appeal. In Quebec, disciplinary council decisions go to the Tribunal des professions.
Do I have to report a criminal charge to my college?
In Ontario, yes: registrants must report charges and findings of guilt for offences, including bail conditions linked to a charge. Most other colleges have similar duties in their statute, regulations or standards. Check your own college's rules and timelines.
Does a complaint stay on my public record?
It depends on the outcome and the province. Dismissed complaints and advice are generally not published. In Ontario, cautions, SCERPs and many undertakings are noted on the register; in BC, disciplinary actions and summary protection orders are published. Hearing outcomes are generally public everywhere.
Are osteopathic manual practitioners covered by this process?
Not at present. There is no statutory regulator for osteopathic manual practitioners in any province or territory, so complaints usually go to a voluntary association, an insurer or the courts. Quebec announced in March 2026 that osteopaths will join its professional system, but this is not yet in force. Osteopathic physicians are licensed by medical colleges and follow the medical process.
When should I start a remediation course?
Many professionals start once they understand the concern, often after a first conversation with their adviser. Choose courses that match the allegation, keep your certificate and reflective account, and let your adviser decide when to share them.
Official sources
Checked October 2026. Rules and processes change, so confirm the current position with the official source. This page is general information, not legal advice.
- Government of Ontario e-Laws: Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991 (Schedule 2, Health Professions Procedural Code)
- College of Respiratory Therapists of Ontario: How are decisions about complaints made?
- College of Registered Psychotherapists of Ontario: Information for registrants about complaints
- College of Dietitians of Ontario: Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee
- College of Respiratory Therapists of Ontario: Member self-reporting obligations (fact sheet)
- College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC: Health Professions and Occupations Act
- College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC: Health Professions and Occupations Act comes into force on April 1
- College of Health and Care Professionals of BC: HPOA bylaws overview, public protection
- College of Physicians & Surgeons of Alberta: What is the role of the complaints director?
- College of Physicians & Surgeons of Alberta: Appeals and reviews
- LégisQuébec: Professional Code (CQLR c C-26)
- Ordre des psychologues du Québec: What is the Disciplinary Council?
- Gouvernement du Québec: announcement on integrating osteopaths into the professional system
- Canadian Medical Protective Association: College complaint information package
- Nurses Association of New Brunswick: Canadian Nurses Protective Society coverage
- Government of Saskatchewan: Health regulators
- Manitoba Fair Registration Practices Office: Regulator contact list (June 2026)
- Manitoba Health: The Regulated Health Professions Act
- Government of Nova Scotia: Health profession regulators
- Government of Nova Scotia: Regulated Health Professions Act overview
- BC Health Regulators: Regulatory reform and the Health Professions and Occupations Act
How this guide is researched
Official sources only
Every legal and regulatory point comes from primary sources: provincial and territorial health professions statutes, the regulatory colleges' standards and codes, and federal and provincial privacy law. Anything we cannot confirm is left out.
Original, edition by edition
Lessons, scenarios and assessment questions are written by us for each edition separately, then checked for accuracy, teaching quality and fair assessment before publication.
Reviewed when rules change
When a code, standard or law changes, the affected courses are reviewed and updated. Reported errors in legal or regulatory facts are corrected first.